Idaho
Public Utilities Commission
Case No.
FLS-W-12-01
July 6, 2012
Contact:
Gene Fadness (208) 334-0339, 890-2712
Website: www.puc.idaho.gov
Public hearing is
Tuesday in Falls Water rate case
The three
commissioners who will decide the Falls Water rate case will be in Ammon
Tuesday, July 10, to hear from customers of the water utility which serves
about 3,900 customers north of Ammon and northeast of Idaho Falls.
The hearing
begins at 7 p.m. in the Ammon City Hall at 2135 S. Ammon Road. There is no
presentation by commission staff or the commissioners. The sole purpose of the
hearing is to hear testimony from customers.
Falls Water
seeks to increase its annual revenue by about $295,000, which could mean a 26.5
percent or higher rate increase for customers.
According to commission staff calculations, the average Falls Water
customer uses 20,000 gallons per month and more than 90 percent of customers
are on a ¾-inch meter. The average
monthly bill of that customer is now $20.98 per month and would increase to
$29.23, or about a 39.3 percent increase if the company’s request were granted
in full.
Commission
staff, which operates independently of the commission, is recommending an
increase of $15,832 in annual revenue, or about 1.4 percent above current
annual revenue. The impact to a customer who uses the system average of just
under 20,000 gallons per month would be about a 1.6 percent increase in rates
from the current $20.76 per month to $21.10.
Major staff
adjustments include reducing requested annual revenue by more than $700,000 to
disallow expense Falls Water included for converting about 3,300 meters to
automated meter reading devices (AMR).
Staff claims the meter conversion is not economically justifiable,
noting that the $8,315 per year estimated savings from reduced fuel and labor expense, it would still take the company almost 86 years to
recover its investment.
Staff
further maintains that Falls Water did not seek initial authorization from the
commission to convert all its meters to AMR.
The company’s capital investment in AMR is “extremely large” compared to
its commission-approved rate base, staff said. “Because of the size of the
investment, staff believes the company should have sought commission approval
for the investment before launching the project. Having failed to do so, the
company proceeded at its own peril.”
The
commission did approve in the company’s 2009 rate case, automated meters for
approximately 600 multi-family, commercial and residential accounts. That
expense, about $126,300, is recommended to be included in rates.
Among
several other adjustments, commission staff also recommends removal of about
$80,700 in depreciation expense related to those meters and another $92,500
related to land and water rights.
You can read
staff comments by going to the Commission’s Web site at www.puc.idaho.gov, click on
the water icon, then on “Open Water Cases,” and scroll down to Case No. FLS-W-12-01. Click on the “Comments” link under Staff, dated
June 15, or cut and paste the following link in your browser:
http://www.puc.idaho.gov/internet/cases/water/FLS/FLSW1201/staff/20120615COMMENTS.PDF
Falls Water
argues the meters will allow for year-round meter reading (currently the
company does not read meters during the winter months), reducing labor and fuel
expense. Monthly reads also help the company more quickly discover and respond
to leaks. Customers who experience excess water use during the winter due to
leaks are not pleased with their corresponding April water bills on top of
repair expense, the company claims. The
company further argues that other utilities are converting to AMR systems.
You can read
the Falls Water response to staff comments by going to the commission’s Web
site and following the same steps above, and going to Company reply comments
dated June 29, 2012. Or you can cut and paste the following address in your
browser:
http://www.puc.idaho.gov/internet/cases/water/FLS/FLSW1201/company/20120629REPLY%20COMMENTS.PDF
The commission is free to reject, approve or modify the
company’s request as well as those recommendations made by staff.
For those who do not want to provide oral testimony at the
public hearing, the commission continues to take written comment through July
13. Comments are accepted via e-mail by accessing the
commission’s Website and clicking on "Comments & Questions About a Case." Fill in the case number (FLS-W-12-01)
and enter your comments.
###