Idaho Public Utilities Commission
Case No.
TFW-T-09-01, Order No. 32358
September
21, 2011
Contact:
Gene Fadness (208) 334-0339, 890-2712
Website: www.puc.idaho.gov
Commission declines to
reconsider telecommunications order
The Idaho
Public Utilities Commission has affirmed its earlier denial of an application
by TracFone Wireless, Inc., a prepaid wireless service provider, to be declared
an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in Idaho. ETC status would have qualified
TracFone to receive money from federal and state low-income assistance
programs.
The denial
is due primarily to TracFone’s refusal to contribute to a combined federal and
state program called “Lifeline.” Funded by a 6-cent surcharge on each residential,
business and wireless phone line in the state, Lifeline provides discounts that
allow qualifying low-income households to retain basic telephone service. TracFone
claims it cannot assess its customers the surcharge because it offers pre-paid
wireless service rather than billing its customers, which would provide a mechanism
for collecting the surcharge. TracFone also said it would not contribute to
Idaho’s Emergency-911 fund. Not doing so is a violation of the Idaho Emergency
Communications Act, the commission ruled.
After the
commission’s July 29 denial, TracFone petitioned for reconsideration. This week
the commission declined to reconsider. TracFone now has the option to appeal to
the state Supreme Court.
TracFone already
offers pre-paid wireless service in Idaho, but sought ETC designation so it could
provide service to low-income customers under the name SafeLink Wireless.
Qualifying customers would receive a free handset and up to 67 minutes of free
time. For use beyond 67 minutes, customers would purchase a pre-paid card at 20
cents per minute. SafeLink offers service to low-income, low-volume users and
transient users who either choose not to enter into long-term service
commitments or are unable to meet the credit requirements necessary to obtain
service from other carriers.
The
commission said the fact that TracFone does not bill its customers does not
justify violating Idaho statutes that require all telecommunications providers
to contribute to E-911 and Lifeline. “TracFone has elected to pursue a business
model that makes the collection of the fees more challenging than a more
typical telecommunications provider ....” the commission said. “We find that
TracFone’s selection of a business model does not render the relevant statutes
inapplicable.”
In its
earlier order, the commission noted TracFone’s testimony that it has the
ability to track the usage rate of its customers and calculate the amount that
would be due in low-income and E-911 surcharges.
TracFone
further argued that denial of its application would be a “disservice” to
low-income households in Idaho. “TracFone’s purported aim of increasing the Lifeline
participation rate for Idaho households, however laudable, must be weighed
against the company’s persistent refusal to contribute to programs that
directly benefit many of those same households,” the commission said.
The
commission’s order, along with other documents related to this case, can be
accessed on the commission’s Website at www.puc.idaho.gov.
Click on the telephone icon, then on “Open Telecom Cases,” and scroll down to
Case No. TFW-T-09-01.
###